Hot topic
search
Yesterday, a refund of tax to the foreign population the news hit the papers, in the
equal access to resources is unreasonable Beijing
Ren: friends do not agree with statement. People from the land, including land for housing, transportation land in residence, the requirements of equal access to resources is unreasonable in Beijing, the final analysis are the household issue. Meanwhile, foreigners enjoyed after the Beijing not enjoy in the domicile of medical, health and other high-quality public facilities, the tax is reasonable.
Sun Dongdong: Do not talk back rebates for people living in secondary cities, there is no need for non to Beijing. Because Beijing special, the National People are yearning for, it can not all policies are open, must take measures such as through the market.
obediently invincible Peter Pan: User put this proposal is too narrow, you do not take the city's way? Does not take a bus, subway it? Do not enjoy the city's law and order it? Why do you want to the city come from? Do not portray itself as vulnerable, first review their inner selfish and self-esteem!
right with the taxes the same basic civil rights
satisfying garden: rights and duties, taxes and welfare of the two pairs of complementary twin brothers, what is it reality? As taxpayers, we have no say,
Zifei Yu: Support, with the same right to tax the most basic rights of citizens is the cornerstone of a fair and just society.
Tang chestnut: I think a tax should be tied up residence. I always can not be contributed to urban youth, in the end you have to pay taxes, and finally back to old residence location? Would not it be urban poor poorer, the rich richer.
No comments:
Post a Comment